Weekend Miscellany: Atkinson, Chase, Wallander

godinruinsI haven’t been a very diligent blogger lately! Well, I did write up another ‘This Week In My Sabbatical’ post on Thursday, but it was so dull I deleted it without posting. The gist of it was that I have been writing more stuff (quite a bit of it, which is good, at least), and doing some reading, but there really didn’t seem to be much to say about any of it, and who wants more moping from me about how difficult it gets for me when my schedule is so amorphous (and it isn’t even summer yet!) or more angst-ridden second thoughts about the state of my career?

Actually, one of the things I read was Kate Atkinson’s A God in Ruins, and there is plenty to say about that — but I’m going to write up a “proper” review for Open Letters Monthly, so I don’t want to say much about it here. Is it silly to worry about “spoilers” for a review? That’s not exactly the concern, but duplication is. I will just say, then, that I read the book with absolutely rapt attention and, eventually, helpless tears, but that nonetheless I ended up feeling extremely frustrated, not so much with the novel itself but with Atkinson as a novelist, which may, I suppose, be a distinction without a difference.

I was so impressed with so much of A God in Ruins, though, that I’ve taking Case Histories off my shelf for a reread. I don’t think I’ve read it since I first got it, which was not long after it came out in 2004. I remember thinking it was very good, and I’ve read all the subsequent Jackson Brodie books, but I’ve never really considered them as options for my mystery class. Since I’m not teaching it until the winter term, I have a bit of time to consider tweaking the reading list (again!). It’s easier to switch up older books from the classic subgenres than to find recent books that have a tempting balance of innovation and thematic complexity. (Two recent contenders were Finding Nouf and The Unquiet Dead, but neither quite convinced me.) I’ll report back! And as always, if you have suggestions, let me know. Another option I’ve been thinking about is including a “literary” crime novel (Alias Grace, for instance), since one of our ongoing topics in the class is precisely the validity and/or usefulness of the whole notion of “genre” vs. “literary” fiction, or to add Paul Auster’s City of Glass back to the list — but its postmodern posturing was getting on my nerves the last time I assigned it, so maybe not. Someone recently recommend Jonathan Lethem’s Motherless Brooklyn to me: thoughts on that one? Should I give it a try?

hellionI’ve been reading some romance novels in between other things. One of them was Loretta Chase’s The Last Hellion — which I didn’t really like. Chase’s Lord of Scoundrels was one of the first historical romances recommended to me back when I was taking my tentative (and skeptical) first steps into the genre. I thought it was ludicrous! But I’ve come a long way since then, and now it is among my favorites, though I still find the prose a bit too purple for my taste at times, and the last 25% of it doesn’t interest me very much. (I’ve mentioned before, I think, that I often don’t like or don’t even read the conclusions of romance novels — once the tension goes out of them, my inner cynic kicks in, or something.) Chase’s Mr. Impossible has become even more of a favorite. But something about The Last Hellion just didn’t work for me. The hero was uncomfortably aggressive in his advances, the story around the central romance seemed unnecessarily contrived, the heroine was too beautiful — which has become a bit of an ongoing annoyance. As an antidote, I returned to Judith Ivory’s The Proposition, which I remembered having a heroine who for once was not conventionally beautiful. What a relief! And the story is fun: it’s basically Pygmalion meets Dirty Dancing.

For our evening TV, my husband and I have started watching the Wallander adaptations starring Kenneth Branagh. I didn’t get along very well with Wallander in the books (though to be fair I haven’t read many of them). The show is no less grim, but everyone who told me how good the adaptations are was right. In particular, I think they are among the most beautifully filmed TV shows I’ve ever watched: stills from many of the scenes would look wonderful mounted and framed, though they are a bit stark or melancholy — which of course is appropriate for the series. Branagh is superb, as well: the show is as much (maybe more) a character study as a crime drama, and without his charisma it would be too dreary to bear, but he pulls it off. We’ve only watched the first three installments (we’re taking a break to watch Season 3 of Homeland, about which I am pretty ambivalent) but I expect we’ll come back to it. I’m excited that Netflix Canada (which is pretty badly stocked compared to the American version) has just added Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries! We ran a good essay on the series at OLM a while back that piqued my interest, and having now watched the first episode, it definitely seems like good fun, if that isn’t too perverse a thing to say about murder!

8 thoughts on “Weekend Miscellany: Atkinson, Chase, Wallander

  1. Teresa June 7, 2015 / 4:06 pm

    One sort of mystery that I read recently and quite liked was Lauren Beukes’ Broken Monsters. It’s really more of a horror novel than a mystery, but the early chapters in particular read like a typical police novel; the supernatural elements creep in only gradually. Early on, I kept thinking of the one Wallander novel I’ve read (Sidetracked). I don’t know that it’s particularly thematically complex, but it could be interesting for a discussion of genre in general (what is the division between crime and horror). And it’s very “of the moment” in the way she incorporates social media, which could make for interesting discussion.


    • Rohan Maitzen June 7, 2015 / 6:42 pm

      Added to my list of possibles – thank you!


  2. lawless June 7, 2015 / 4:57 pm

    I wonder what you’d make of Miss Wonderful. It’s funny: so many people like Lord of Scoundrels and Mr. Impossiblebest, and I find them unbelievable because the women are so much more accomplished, intelligent, and mature than the men. I can’t buy a long-term HEA in such unbalanced circumstances. If nothing changes, at some point I expect one or both parties to begin despising each other.


    • Rohan Maitzen June 7, 2015 / 6:52 pm

      I’ve read Miss Wonderful and liked it, but not as much as the other two. I agree that when they begin, the women are conspicuously more mature and in much better control of their lives than the men, but I don’t think Rupert in Mr. Impossible is any less intelligent than Daphne — isn’t there a balance between his resolving to make good use of his gifts and her coming out of emotional hiding? Lord of Scoundrels is a bit messier, but it has a similar overall pattern, doesn’t it? And in Dain’s case there’s the whole melodramatic backstory to justify his bad boy behavior. A lot does change by the end, in each case. But who knows — maybe these are just rationalizations because it satisfies something in my fantasy life to have the power imbalanced in this way!


  3. Theresa June 8, 2015 / 9:45 am

    I had a profound sense of melancholy as I read A God in Ruins. After I finished, I went back and re-read your review of Life After Life, which I found thought-provoking, and have been wondering what your review of A God in Ruins will be like.


  4. Jenny @ Reading the End June 8, 2015 / 5:11 pm

    Oh, enjoy Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries! It grew on me more and more as I watched more episodes — the first episode’s good, but after that the relationships start to really develop, and those are what I truly watch for. Dotty’s the cutest. She’s plucky!


  5. Jeffry House June 11, 2015 / 8:00 am

    Since you are considering additions to your reading list, may I mention the Ottawa detective mystery author Peggy Blair? She has written detective novels set in Cuba, and her most recent, this week, includes a detective who is native Canadian. I haven’t read the latter yet, but you might find any of them to be of interest.


    • Rohan June 12, 2015 / 11:29 am

      Thanks for the suggestion, Jeffry! I actually received a review copy of her latest one not long ago but it hasn’t worked its way up to the top of my reading pile yet. It does look interesting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.